I don’t think that the autofocus in the C500 II will outperform the FX9. Printable 29 MB PDF download for SUBSCRIBERS. The FX9 can control all four channels quickly and independently. This in-depth, hands-on workshop teaches participants the skills needed to operate the Canon C300 Mark II / C500 cameras. *Currently it can only go to 3840 × 2160. The FX9 has a smaller 3.5″ (2.76 million dot) LCD with a loupe positioned for shoulder mounted filming. Which one to choose? The Canon C500 Mark II also does anamorphic internally. This camera is ready for any lighting situation you toss it into. For the C500 Mark II I’m just making an educated guess. Clients do pay extra for color grading or DI, and there are decent enough budgets for: You will be working with enough margins to recoup the additional cost in just a matter of months. With modern cameras and their great ISO range you can really manage with discrete levels of ND. In this article we’ll look at all the important specifications relevant to video and see which camera is the better investment for the next 2-3 years for the owner operator. on Sony FX9 vs Canon C500 Mark II: Which is the Best Camera for Video and Filmmaking? 3. Share this article . FX9 is the new generation of Sony’s full-frame cameras and is intended to wrestle against the other full-frame rivals like Canon C500 mark II. According to Canon: For DAF, each pixel in the camera’s CMOS sensor is configured with two photodiodes. *60 fps is with a crop, in Super 35mm mode. Filmmakers Philip Bloom, Nino Leitner, and Hans von Sonntag discuss the new full-frame cinema cameras – the Canon C500 Mark II and the Sony FX9. The C200 is currently $6,499. all ; Most reacted comment ; Hottest comment thread ; Sort by: latest. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Filmmakers Philip Bloom, Nino Leitner, and Hans von Sonntag discuss the new full-frame cinema cameras – the Canon C500 Mark II and the Sony FX9. Canon USA. FCPX Essentials, Part 2: How to Edit Your Footage, FCPX Essentials: How to Import and Organize Your Footage, How to Give Your Footage a Cinematic Look in FCPX. The Canon C300 Mk II feels very solid and is cased in a sturdy Magnesium chassis. I am still very much in doubt which camera Im going to buy. Yes, the Canon is alot more exciting, but for me, Sony still is a better option. You were quick off the mark with great analysis, and you always seem know what the solo independent filmmaker/documentarian is looking out for. For these solid reasons: ^Depending on the frame rate. One advantage of Sony FX9 is the variable electronic ND as opposed to classic internal variable ND with fixed stops in the C500 II. The latest FDTimes 96-page IBC-September Edition. Both can be used by a single shooter, but the FX9 is more friendly for all kinds of video work when you are a one-person operation. 21. Those who are purchasing the Sony FX9 and Canon C500 Mark II are mainly into documentaries, corporate videos, commercials, high-end weddings and maybe the occasional short or feature work. Two independent image signals can then be detected at each photosite and compared using phase-difference to provide autofocus with compatible lenses. Here are the official numbers: *See below for which battery. However, the FX9 will have a future firmware update that will bring the camera up to 120fps at 4K. They compare several aspects of both cameras – for instance, the lens mounts, color science, autofocus, and image stabilization. This is more rugged than the standard E mount on Sony alpha mirrorless cameras. The somewhat comparable Sony FX9 is $11,000. As we have seen before, both cameras meet these specifications, but with the C500 Mark II having the upper hand because it outputs 6K, so even ‘chopped off’ anamorphic will deliver true 4K. *8 and 10 through using two NDs at the same time (6+2) and (6+4). In the first half of this episode, Scott talks with Van Bedient, Adobe’s senior business development manager, about the soon to be available group editing feature for Premiere Pro. This allows it to feature a 5.9K output in full frame, and crop (window) the sensor for Super 35 and Super 16 frame sizes while maintaining a high resolution. From Sony: DCI 4K is a future firmware update. DAF can survey the scene and recognizes not only whether the subject is in focus or not, but in which direction (near or far), and by how much. If the image quality compares to the footage shot by Russel Carpenter on Canon’s C700 promotional film ( whose sensor it shares ), I may very well invest in this system. That’s a $650 dollar value right there. Canon is the class leader here, and with Canon’s range of cinema lenses there’s nothing left to say. Will one of these camera systems reign supreme? The Cinema EOS C500 Mark II features Canon’s high-resolution 5.9K (38.1 x 20.1mm) Full Frame CMOS sensor, which offers exceptional low noise and a broad range of tonality with over 15 stops of dynamic range. Canon sells the following two adapters, both with shim kits: Since we are comparing both cameras for the solo shooter or owner operator, I’ll assume you are okay with the standard EF mount for this comparison. Additionally, video output from the … However, both manufacturers have introduced new full-frame cameras, making this competition even more intense. Both the Sony FX9 and Canon C500 Mark II are proven swiss army knives in the world of solo shooter filmmaking. This was a major reason why so many productions adopted an FS7 workflow. I wish they'd priced the C500 II a bit cheaper. 0. E.g., some people like the top handle of the C500 Mark II, others hate it. Firmware Updates & Frame Rates Which one to choose? Great your Canon C500 Mark II vs. Sony FX9 – Panel Discussion. The Massive Update To the BMPCC4k Is Here, Meet the Pocket-Sized and Versatile Aputure MC Film Light, How to Choose and Use a Capture Card for Your Gaming Needs, Hands-on Review: the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 6K. To really equate both cameras, you need to add the additional Canon EU-V1 or Canon EU-V2 Expansion Unit which gives you: It is clear if you need the Canon C500 Mark II for any sort of regular broadcast work you will have to purchase the EU-V2 expansion unit. If your work is broadcast oriented, with multiple accessories, and you find yourself part of a multi-camera shoot most often, and genlock is important, the choice is a no brainer. By then the price will have dropped a bit too! The C500 MK II has the ability to record 5.9k raw internally, while the FX9 over samples a 6k image for a final 4k output, giving you a cleaner, crisper image, but still at a lower resolution than the MKII.. With a slightly larger sensor and higher resolution recording capability, we’re giving the point here to Canon.. Canon 1 Sony 1. Leave a Reply . The the only camera manufacturer that has AF competing anywhere near the level of Canon is Sony. Thanks. *As of this writing. This feature will, without a doubt, elevate many productions, allowing filmmakers everywhere much more creativity. Firmware Updates & Frame Rates And what you get are: Both of these features are good to have, but don’t really contribute to food on the table. I’m sure the image on the C500 II will be beautiful, but the FX9 is basically my dream camera. Canon’s new-ish full-frame sensor (also offered on the C700 FF) gives filmmakers a more detailed image, with an even shallower depth of field. What it tells us though, is the C500 Mark II is also definitely a cinema camera. The C500 Mark II is capable of 5.9K output in full-frame. Even though it seems Sony has more buttons the reality is Canon’s are completely customizable; and, they are easier to see and press in the field under tough run-and-gun situations. The Sony workaround is not really practical. Not many clients pay extra for 6K or RAW workflows. The Canon C500 Mark II is definitely more expensive on paper. It’s the camera that excites me the most. Both cameras can record HD proxies simultaneously. No more 8 bit! October 18 th, 2019. When we start jumping outside of sensors and resolution, we begin to see the biggest differences between these two cameras. It is important to draw attention to Canon’s non-operator side. Also, if you have multiple accessories it’s a good way to power them as well. I believe it both camera give amazing flavor of video. The Sony FX9 DOES capture 4K Full Frame, S-35 and Open Gate but doesn't capture on-board RAW or with the high data rate of the Canon C500 II. 1 - 2. It is to be noted that the C500 Mark II ships with the larger A60 battery while the FX9 ships with a smaller (and newer) U35 battery. Let us know in the comments below! With the Sony FX9, you have wireless built in, and then some with the XDCA expansion module. I am a Sony shooter, and have to say, the C500 M2 has exited me so much, I many switch systems. Having to put that extra piece on the back of the Sony just to get SDI out is a deal-breaker for me, and a mis-step in my opinion… The modularity of the C500 M2, while maintaining the best image quality, is HUGE. The proxies are 8-bit 4:2:0. Image Stabilization. The C200 has them at the back but to the left, so you could still access it if you were standing on the operator’s side. That’s a difference of $200 or so. Everyone says DPAF is so great but I would love to see real world comparision. ^Sony RAW is via a future firmware update an only possible through the XDCA-FX9 extension unit. To be honest I don’t know how practical this is. The EOS C500 Mark II is the first Canon Cinema EOS camera to feature built-in five-axis electronic IS that works with almost any lens including anamorphic. The C500 Mark II is capable of 60 fps at a full 4K resolution (unlike its predecessors), as is the FX9. It proved extremely popular for the broadcast and corporate markets and independent filmmakers alike, and propelled the Super 35 format into these segments. Sony PXW-FX9: https://geni.us/13TCB Canon C500 Mark II: https://bhpho.to/2VmTJSO My Sony FX9 Review: … If yes, then the Sony FX9 is the right investment for you. Sony has just one glass, and it is controlled by one mechanism. The Canon EOS C500 Mark II 5.9K Full-Frame Camera Body is part of the Cinema EOS lineup of cameras, and it features a full-frame CMOS sensor with an effective 18.69MP resolution. You have three choices: I really don’t see the point of the V50. Sony had the market and were pretty relaxed about it. Media card costs are an important percentage of ownership: ^Sony XQD G cards 240 GB. Of course, the big question is: Is the Canon C500 Mark II worth the extra $5,000? The Canon C500 Mk II uses the same sensor as the Canon C700 FF, built into a versatile, modular compact form factor camcorder which is shorter than the C300 Mk II and body weighting just 1.75kg (without battery). The lower resolution doesn’t really matter if it’s used like an LCD. Canon has outfitted the C300III with a Super 35mm image sensor whereas Sony went big with a full-frame imager. If you select Auto the camera automatically controls exposure through the right ND setting. With Canon EF lenses, though, you can combine electronic IS (note, it’s not mechanical IBIS like Sony alpha mirrorless cameras) with IS on the lenses, so I’d be more inclined to give this one to Canon. This difference also tells an important story. This feature is also compatible with any E-mount lens and allows for far faster processing than conventional NLE stabilisation (sic) workflows…. That means Canon EF for the C300 Mark III and Sony E for the FX9. Its feature set is all around better than what’s offered internally in the FX9 (again, aside from the AF; Sony’s AF in the FX9 is stellar), and this is the umpteenth time I’ve seen someone compare the image of Canon Cinema Raw Light (from the C500 II or the C200) to the gold standard, Arri Alexa. In addition, Face Detection intelligently recognises and locks on to human faces. Click below. The 38.1 x 20.1 mm sensor offers an impressive fifteen stops of dynamic range. Interview with Alexander Marik, CEO of ETAS GmbH, one of the leading distributors of video and audio equipment for clients in all broadcast, … Original batteries only, from B&H. It is to be noted that the C500 Mark II ships with the larger A60 battery while the FX9 ships with a smaller (and newer) U35 battery. However, there are major differences between the two. If money were no object, for the best image quality, one can always opt for the Arri Amira or Red Monstro. EOS C500 Mark II 5.9K Full Frame sensor; 4K at 50p/60p with 4:2:2 sampling; Cinema RAW Light and XF-AVC Intra Frame records to CFExpress Type B Cards And take a guess on durability and servic-ability of each camera considering past models since these are knew, Another great review and insight Canon C500 Mark II is able to deliver up to 5.9K RAW video internally, whereas Sony FX9 only records up to 4K internally and 6K externally. Sony hit the market at nearly the same time with their full-frame mid-tier option. It should be Mbps. That would make me see what kind of image im able to pull out of the cameras. The Canon 300 Mark II or the original C500 both had audio modules separate. These are the cameras used in high end television and documentaries.
Best Monospace Font Windows 10, Language Style Guide Examples, Enrolment Id Meaning In Malayalam, God Of War Digital Comic Book, Samsung Parts Location, Powerpoint Quiz Maker, Kitchfix Granola Bars, Powerpoint Too Large To Open In Google Slides, Alternative To String Trimmer,